Ashes 2013
Do Australia Know What They Want?
July 29th
[10:30 CEST]
There is a sensation that Australia simply do not have a clear idea of what
they want and where they plan to go. The latest idea is that maybe they will go
into the 3rd Test on Thursday with two front-line spinners – Agar and
Lyon – presumably supported by Steve Smith. This may mean Lyon coming in for
Pattinson rather than Jackson Bird, as had been expected. This could lead to
Australia fielding Siddle and the injury-plagued Ryan Harris, backed-up by the
more gentle pace of Shane Watson as the seam attack. Given Ryan Harris’s injury
record it is a huge risk to take to make him the spearhead of a two-man pace
attack and rely on the hope that he will not break down, especially as the 2nd
Test represented the largest number of deliveries that he has ever had to make
in a single Test match. Nathan Lyon though has every right to feel hard done
by. Even though not even Australians will claim that he is a great spinner, or
even an especially good one, he is the best that they have fielded for several
years and has a quite reasonable Test record. His performance at Hove reflected
the confusion and lack of self-confidence that he must feel on being dropped
for a promising 19 year old who has looked somewhat out of his depth bowling.
At the top
of the order there are calls for Watson and/or Rogers to be dropped. While
Watson’s limitations were well known, Rogers has been a major disappointment.
In imperious form for Middlesex he was expected to use his knowledge of English
conditions to good advantage. Instead, after three Tests he is averaging just
18 and scores of 16, 52, 15 and 6 in this series are far less than Australia
hoped for. Despite one fifty, England seem to have his number. Some would like
to see a return for Ed Cowan but, after 18 Tests, he averages just 31.3, well
below what is expected for a specialist bat in Tests and may be lucky to have
had as many opportunities as he has received. One option is for Phillip Hughes
to move back up the order to try to get him away from Graeme Swann. After a
thunderous start in Tests against South Africa, Phil Hughes now averages just
32.7: he is the sort of player who Australia would never have even considered
for the squad in richer eras. Khawaja batted at 3 at Lords and did a decent
job, but his attitude and appetite for work have often been regarded as suspect
by the team management and he is not totally safe from being the man sacrificed
to make room for David Warner.
Looking at
the Test career averages for the top seven used by Australia in the first two
Tests reminds you just how far the art of Australian batting has fallen: Rogers,
18.0; Watson, 34.9; Cowan, 31.3; Khawaja, 30.1; Hughes, 32.7; Clarke, 51.8; Smith,
29.0; and Haddin, 34.7. Apart from Clarke, no one averages over 40 and none of the rest even averages over 35 in Tests. In contrast, Cook,
Root, Trott, Pietersen, Bell and Prior all average over 40 for England and
Bairstow and Bresnan over 30. Even if David Warner plays, he averages 39.5 and
so would still leave Australia with a top seven of which only one averages over
40 in Tests. It is a far cry from the sides that Australia fielded through most
of the last fifteen years.
England
though would be well advised to remember a guy called Steve Waugh. He came to
England in 1989 averaging just 30.5 after 26 Tests. England had played him in
Australia in 1986/87 and in 1988 and did not regard his batting as a major
problem. By the end of the Ashes summer that year he averaged 40.1 and had made
his point. There are still three Tests left in this series and any one of that
Australian top six could suddenly become a hero with a couple of big centuries
if England relax their guard.
However,
the simple fact remains that to have any hope of re-gaining the Ashes Australia
must win at Old Trafford and that may spur them to take some major gambles. If
England win, the series is lost, but better to go down fighting. The problem is
that the only positions that they seem to have clear right now are those of
Clarke, Haddin and Siddle.
No comments:
Post a Comment