County Championship
Oh Dear! The
Championship is Becoming too Popular, Let’s do Something About it… Quickly!
September 27th
2016
Bizarre
things happen within English cricket. At the very moment when the climax of the
2016 Championship produces the biggest crowd for a County Championship match
since 1966 – yes, that is for forty years – we see the end of the Championship
in its current, reduced state, which it has had since the year 2000, to exactly
half the number of games that it had had since settling into its near final
format in 1929 until the first reduction in 1969.
This is the
premier competition in English cricket and one from which the future Test
players who make up the lifeblood of the sport are drawn.
Since 1960
the County Championship has changed its format time and again, usually reducing
the number of matches although we should remember that the high point in the
early 1980s was 24, 3-day matches, or 72 days whereas, since 2000, we have played
16, 4-day games, or 64 days, so the difference is not so large, although the
increasing pace of games has permitted the number of overs to reduce
considerably. 111 overs per day minimum in the early 1980s meant a theoretical
season of 7992 overs whereas, in 2016, it has been 6144 (a 23% reduction).
The number
of changes in the number of County Championship games – increases and decreases
since 1960 – is bewildering. The first
change of format since it was fixed in 1929 was actually an increase in the number of matches:
·
1929 – 1959 – all counties played 28 matches
·
1960 – 8 counties played 32 matches, the rest 28
·
1963 – all counties played 28 matches
·
1969 – reduced to 24 matches
·
1972 – reduced to 20 matches
·
1977 – increased to 22 matches
·
1983 – increased to 24 matches
·
1988 – reduced to 22 matches
·
1993 – reduced to 17 matches and Durham introduced
to increase the counties to 18.
·
2000 – reduced to 16 matches and split into 2
divisions
·
2017 – reduced to 14 matches and the divisions
changed to 8 and 10. For the first time since 1992, Division 2 sides play some
teams home and away and others either home or away.
When we talk
about “the reduction of the Championship” there have actually been seven reductions
since 1963 and three increases.
Back in 1969,
when the Championship was reduced from 28 to 24 matches, to a large degree it
was to provide space for the Sunday League. 40 overs. Reduced run-ups. An ideal
Sunday afternoon TV and family package. It was very much the precursor of T20
cricket. The games started at 2pm and ended at 6:40pm at latest. While many
players hated it and the extra travel and intensity that it brought about,
especially as the games were almost always played in the middle of a Championship
match starting on a Saturday (!!), the fans loved it. I spent many Sunday
afternoons at the County Ground in Bristol in the midst of a noisy, lively,
family crowd of typically 6000-8000 who roared on their heroes. When the
competition was introduced it was a very different game to anything seen
previously, but also very different to anything we see today: 160-170 was
regarded as a par score for 40 overs; 180 gave you a better than even chance of
defending and anything around 200 was seen as a massive score.
Part of the
justification for reducing the Championship was its waning appeal. It is something that is impossible to deny.
In the immediate post-war years, cricket was one of the great summer entertainments
for the public. It was quite normal for an office worker to do his shift in the
office and then go down to The Oval, or Lord’s or Edgbaston for an hour or so
to watch the game before heading home. Test cricket could boast radio audiences
of up to eight million: TV hardly existed. My father, then working in de
Havilland at Hatfield, talks of spending his days off at Lord’s watching
Compton and Edrich in the ‘50s when an ordinary County game would bring in ten
or fifteen thousand paying punters and big games, far more. By the early 1960s
though, those crowds had melted away. It was this period that cemented the “one
man and his dog” legend that still haunts the County Championship.
My own first
experience of going to a Championship match was the last day of the 1977
season. Led by the incomparable Mike Proctor – the greatest all-rounder ever –
Gloucestershire went into the final round of matches as leader, but with any
one of Middlesex, Kent and Gloucestershire able to win. A school friend, who was
a member, took me along to see the end of the Gloucesterhire v Hampshire game
where, we hoped, we would see Gloucestershire seal the title. Sadly, by the
time that we arrived from classes the game was all but over and a kindly
gateman let us in free. Mike Proctor had set Hampshire around 270 to win,
knowing that victory would seal the title (Middlesex and Kent were winning, so
Gloucestershire had to win too). Gordon Greenidge scored a murderous century
and Hampshire cruised home. In those days with no points for draws, two matches
abandoned without a ball bowled were decisive for Gloucestershire.
That day
Gloucestershire had asked the public to come out in force and wanted to be able
to put up the “ground full” signs. Neville Road was not completely full, but
there was at least 6000 people inside and a wonderful atmosphere. The bug bit
and I became a member, although knowing that with school six days a week, attending
games would be limited to Sundays.
I did not
get to another County Championship match until five years later. Middlesex v
Gloucestershire at Lord’s. Mid-week afternoon. Gloomy. Match heading for a
draw. And, literally, I could count the people in the stands on the fingers of
one hand. If anything brought home how the County Championship had fallen, it
was that.
Of course,
in those days, one day cricket was king. It was televised. It was lively. I
watched games at places like Canterbury and Southampton. Even an early round of
the NatWest Trophy would pull in a healthy crowd on a Wednesday morning. Who
needed a Championship when clubs could rake in money with Cup matches and the
Sunday League?
Going abroad
to live cut me off from cricket. There was no Internet in the mid-1980s. My
entire contact with cricket was from the short BBC World Service sports bulletins
in the evening and Paddy Feeny and Saturday Special at the weekend, plus any
books or magazines that I picked up on trips back to the UK.
The biggest single
change in cricket over the last fifteen years is not T20, changes in the rules,
or anything similar. It has been the development of the Internet and of
Internet streaming. This seems to be the single factor that has brought about a
steady revival in the fortunes of the County Championship, with the public at
least. First, services such as CricInfo allowed people in their offices anywhere
in the world to follow the progress of games in real time. Then BBC Local Radio
harked back to the golden age of radio when the regions could opt out of
national programming to bring local content: often live commentary on County
matches.
It was a
revolution when I discovered that Mark Church was broadcasting live
ball-by-ball on Surrey’s Championship matches on BBC Radio London. What is
more, it was lively, entertaining and the listeners were encouraged to participate
with their feedback, wherever they were in the world. Then Ned Hall started to broadcast
Middlesex games too and one had a choice of game: if one was dying a death or
was halted by rain, you could go to the other. These games were wonderful
entertainment. While Mark Church broadcast with the Surrey Librarian as
summariser, Ned Hall did the full day alone and brought in players, guests,
listener feedback and anything else to liven-up the day. Ned passed the baton
to Kevin Hand who had an infectious enthusiasm.
It was hard
to listen to the commentaries day after day – and many thousands did – without being
caught up in the fun. One day it might be Tierry, the pastry chef at Lord’s who
was brought in for a shift as summariser (he is, I believe, Belgian and knows nothing
about cricket, but an awful lot about cream cakes!), another day it would be
Clare Skinner, the then media manager at Lord’s, or Vinnie Codrington (Chief
Executive), or one of the players, or Will Atkins (best known to fans for
wearing the Pinkie the Panther costume at T20s). It did not matter how dull the
game was because the chat was wonderful, the feedback from listeners, lively
and they never missed a ball… except when the line went down and, on occasion,
they “broadcast” a whole session, blissfully unaware that no one was able to
hear them. Some of the slow days were particular fun when feedback became
themed. The day when players and commentators were fitted into Star Wars
personas was an all-time highlight: to this day the true identity of Darth
Vader is known only to a very few and deliberately shrouded in mystery in the
Middlesex commentary box (listeners are usually led to believe that it is Kevin Hand's regular side-kick, henchman and Dark Lord, "DT", but it most certainly was not)!
What Mark
Church and Kevin Hand and their guests were doing was make County Championship
cricket fun.
As word
spread, other counties joined in. Initially some only broadcast home games, or
sent a guest commentator to join the Radio London boys. Some of the commentary
efforts were dire, but most were pretty good: there are some wonderful commentaries out there.
For several
years now, the BBC has offered live commentary on every County Championship
match, plus One Day Cup, T20, some tourist games and even, occasional Minor
County matches. Unlike Test cricket, which is usually geo-locked, a Yorkshire
fan or a Kent fan can hear commentary live and free anywhere in the world.
And, lo and
behold, coincidence or not but, despite the newspapers scaling back their
cricket coverage, the crowds were steadily increasing. I try to get to games
when in the UK during the cricket season and contrast what I see with that
afternoon in 1982. A cold May Sunday morning at Lord’s the stands disgorged a
huge number of people at Lunch. Sat in the stands at The Oval in 2011, watching
the end of a mid-season, mid-week Division 2 game, if not exactly heaving,
there must have been at least 1500 people present in the areas that were open.
A morning at Chester-le-Street in early August with a very healthy and lively
crowd. I have not attended many days of cricket over the last five years, but
the ones that I have, the only “one man and his dog” day was a game that was in
its last rites and only produced about an hour of play on the third morning as
the home side moved to a comfortable win.
You will
usually hear the phrase parroted “no one watches County cricket”. The people
who say this, inevitably, follow up with “I never go”. While that was true
twenty years ago, the last ten years have seen a steady increase in both
interest and attendances. Accurate attendance figures are hard to come by: only
paying customers on the gate actually get counted. That means that the
corporate hospitality guests – an increasing part of every club’s business –
are not counted. Members – the equivalent of season ticket holders in football –
are not counted. Even so, the number of paying punters has increased steadily, year
on year.
Apart from
the fact that radio commentary is creating a generation of new fans – as is
possibly T20 but, there, it is not certain how many of the people who attend on
a Friday night will turn up for the County Championship – the Championship
itself has had some wonderful finishes over the last few years. Live text and
interactive chats by hosts such as the BBC and CricInfo allow many thousands
who cannot listen-in in the office to follow the action, with the BBC recording
a huge number of page accesses for their live text reporting on the last day
this season.
One can be
melodramatic and fall into hyperbole, declaring that the County Championship
has never been so popular. That is just plain daft! In the 1920s and ‘30s
crowds filled the grounds most days of the season to watch Championship
matches: that will never happen again. However, the County Championship is
enjoying a surge of interest, particularly in Division 1.
Properly harnessed,
the growing enthusiasm for the County game can bring benefits at all levels.
Youngsters on the village green aspire to play for a club. Young club players
aspire to be picked up by a county. County players want Test recognition.
Cricket has always had this informal feeder system that has been threatened by
the decline of cricket in schools and the steady reduction in recreational cricketers.
With a healthy and popular County Championship the conveyor belt of talent
keeps moving.
We often
forget that the County Championship is unique in the world in having an important
following. Inter-provincial, inter-state and inter-island First Class
competitions exist around the world, but have been dying. The Sheffield Shield
in Australia, once the premier First Class tournament, has been declining for
year and has a spectator interest that has fallen away steadily until now, few
attend. India used to have several wonderful First Class tournaments that are
now dying and generate little interest. Pakistan First Class cricket has never
attracted spectators. In the Caribbean and South Africa the First Class
tournaments are struggling to survive (whatever happened to the Caribbean Shell
Shield, which was for some years the toughest competition in the world?)
Only in
England does it seem that First Class cricket has a real following and crowds,
while not huge, remain respectable and are trending up, unlike anywhere else in the world where they are reducing still further. Where else in the world would a team, not
renowned for being well supported, be able to report a total attendance of near
22 000 paying spectators over four days, plus probably another few thousand
members?
County
cricket is becoming popular again. That though is very inconvenient because it
does not sell TV rights or seal huge sponsorship deals.
After a previous
effort to reduce the Championship to 12 games was defeated after an outpouring
of rage, a new proposal has come in by stealth.
In 2017
Division 1 will be reduced to 8 sides. Oh look! Eight sides means seven home
and away games. Fourteen in all. More room for T20!
Just at the
moment that our premier competition, which is proving to be a good breeder for
the Test side, is going through a boom in popularity to levels not seen since
the 1960s, we start to hack at it on the grounds of the good of the game.
The other
side of the coin is that Division 2 now has 10 teams but, to keep things fair (ahem!),
will also play just 14 games. After 16 years of playing every side in your
Division home and away, Division 2 sides now face an existence at the mercy of
the fixture computer: you play every side once, either home or away, and four
sides twice. Woe betide the team that discovers that the luck of the draw gives
it the two relegated sides from 2016 – Hampshire and Nottinghamshire – home and
away, plus the sides the finished second and third in the table in 2016 – Kent and
Northamptonshire. Another side may discover that it faces the bottom four from
2016 home and away and gets the strongest sides only at home. For the first
time in many years a team will look at the fixtures when they come out and know
that it is either going to be a very, very tough slog, or a fairly comfortable
route to a tilt at promotion.
The ECB
seems to struggle to strike a happy medium. Years ago now it took the decisions,
“for the good of the game”, that led to free-to-air cricket disappearing from
our homes. That decision reduced cricket awareness in the community. Take an
example: show the faces of the XI players who took the field for the final Test
of the summer to a group of cricket fans and see how many they can recognise. I
know that I, for one, would struggle to get much more than half. Show me a picture
of the 1981 Ashes team and I would probably get all eleven – the images from
that summer such as Bob Willis in a near-trance at the top of his run at
Headingley live with fans for ever. Now, the ECB struggles to balance a One Day Cup
competition that really no one cares about these days (the number of fixtures
has increased massively to accommodate television, with most games being played
to near empty grounds with far fewer spectators than for your average
Championship game), with a T20 tournament that has never quite gelled and a
County Championship still seen by many as the main event of the summer.
The ECB
would like its T20 competition to be as popular and attract as many stars and
as much revenue as the IPL or the Big Bash, but has never quite hit on a
formula. Fans will tell you that it is one thing going to a night game at
Sydney or Mumbai, with their long, warm evenings, but quite another to go to a
game at Chester-le-Street in early June when it is not properly dark until 10pm
and the temperature may be below 10°C. The cool, humid evenings of
the UK were not really designed for T20 cricket.
Of course,
you can do things to make it better. Having regular slots for games helps.
Playing games in the summer holiday and, especially, at the weekend, helps. Blocking
the games in a relatively short period helps, particularly to bring in the
stars. While there is something to be said for playing T20 every Friday or
Saturday night (pick one) through the season so that fans know that every
second weekend there will be a home game, playing T20 at night in late April or
early May is unpleasant even in the warmer and drier parts of the country.
What is an
unmitigated disaster is to kill your other tournaments in desperate, flailing
efforts to support a competition that you just are not getting right, or to
bring in a competition that no one actually particularly wants.
So, if there
is too much cricket, what can you do to try to protect your crown jewels, but
also make money?
It might
look something like this:
·
Make the Royal London One Day Cup a straight
knock-out with 32 teams in the first round. The 18 First Class counties to be
joined by 14 qualifiers taken from Scotland, Ireland, Denmark, The Netherlands,
the Minor Counties and the recreational cricketers of the County Board XIs and,
possibly, the UCCEs (alternatively, have a representative European Associate
and Affiliate Member XI). You help European cricket and give your Sunday
afternoon cricketer the chance to aspire to play Middlesex at Lord’s or
Yorkshire at Headingley. No seeding, to bring back the possibility of giant-killing
and Cup runs.
·
Block the T20 into the second half of July and
first half of August. Play most games on Friday nights and Saturdays, with
Saturday local derby double-headers every weekend as a family day out (e.g.
Surrey might play Middlesex and Essex one Saturday and Gloucestershire would
play Glamorgan and Somerset another Saturday, while Yorkshire might host a
double-header with Lancashire and Durham). Just playing Fridays with Saturday
double-headers each side will play 10 games in 4 weeks or 15 games in 6 weeks,
even without playing any other day of the week and TV will have a compact
package that it can sell to the public.
Add the fun elements for families: bouncy castles, hot tubs (for the
younger couples), side-shows, etc. so that even Mum, who is not a cricket fan,
is willing to come too and spend a day with the kids, enjoying the fun inside
the ground.
·
Either play three divisions of seven in the county
Championship with end of season play-offs for the Championship, promotion and
relegation to increase the number of games (and to introduce more "pressure games"), or return to a system of two, equal
divisions with everyone playing everyone else home and away.
Play the Championship games either from Sunday to Wednesday or from
Wednesday to Saturday to ensure at least one weekend day in each match,
preferably a Saturday with the chances of seeing a positive finish. Start the
Championship in late April or preferably early May and play through to late
September when the weather is usually far better and more reliable than in
April anyway. Take advantage of the last three weeks of the school holidays to
play Championship cricket, hopefully attracting some fans who have been
watching the T20 and are willing to try the longer form.
Is it too much to ask that we try to preserve the jewel in the Crown in an undiminished form?
No comments:
Post a Comment