Saturday, 24 September 2016

County Championship: Of Champions and Contrived Results


 

County Championship

Of Champions and Contrived Results

September 24th  2016

So, after some remarkable events over the last four days, Middlesex have been pronounced Champions. A match that was dying and that appeared to have been killed the previous day, suddenly came to life in mid-afternoon of the last day of the season, with the Trophy seemingly coming off the Taunton exit of the M5 after an inexorable three and a half day trip from Headquarters.
On one level there will be some serious soul-searching and a few complaints that it is a tarnished victory for Middlesex.

That point of view is absurd.
Middlesex went top of the table on July 6th with a big win against Yorkshire and were never headed [save briefly in the penultimate round when they were 2 points behind, but had a game in hand]. At that point, after 9 games, the Middlesex lead over Yorkshire was 15 points (Yorkshire with one game in hand) and over Somerset, more interested in not slipping into the relegation battle, 25 points.

Victory against Somerset in the next round of games left Middlesex 38 points ahead of Yorkshire and 45 ahead of Somerset (look how their nearest challengers on July 13th, after 10 games, were Warwickshire and Lancashire, both of which entered the last day under real threat of relegation and watching anxiously the events at Southampton).
Somerset gave a hint of things to come by winning their next two games against the free-falling Nottinghamshire (themselves top of the table after 4 rounds – a quarter of the season) and Durham.

On August 16th, Middlesex were 26 points clear of Yorkshire, having played a game more and 35 points clear of Somerset, also with a game in hand.
September 3rd. Games in hand played out. Three matches left. Middlesex still top, 4 points ahead of Yorkshire, 21 points ahead of the rapidly rising Somerset.

September 14th. For the only time since taking over at the top on July 6th, Middlesex were headed when Somerset beat Yorkshire and, Middlesex, with a game in hand, momentarily found themselves a full 2 points behind Yorkshire and 1 point behind Somerset.
At this point, bearing disaster in their last two games, Middlesex were virtual Champions, given that even two, high-scoring draws would be likely to win the title. Victory at Old Trafford would all-but-seal a thoroughly merited title. Middlesex supporters know  though that their side is likely to shred nerves at any moment. How right they are!

Old Trafford. September 12th. Middlesex bat and are 151-1 in the 50th over. With plenty of forcing batting to come, 350 looks certain, even 400 in 110 overs requires little more than 4-an-over from there. A partnership of 97 in 34 overs for the third wicket made the 5th batting point unlikely, but the 4th, should have fallen. What happened was a slow crawl as the enormity of the situation seemed to paralyse the batting: even the 300 and a third batting point was just, barely reached inside 110 overs with James Franklin and Toby Roland-Jones just barely scrambling over the line before Middlesex subsided to a disappointing 327, taking up almost four sessions to do it.
Even then, the go-slow seemed irrelevant as Lancashire slipped to 6-4. Not too many people have Toby Roland-Jones on their list of likely England bowlers, but when he is on song with the new ball he can be very destructive and is extremely consistent. However, the Middlesex bowling has also shown an alarming tendency not to follow through on early breakthroughs and to let opponents off the hook. 6-4 became 32-5, 138-6 and 230-7. Even though Lancashire themselves collapsed from 230-6 to 250ao, another 100 overs had been taken out of the game, only around 4 sessions remained and Middlesex needed to add to their lead… FAST! The collapse to 55-4 was the last thing that they needed. 140 ahead on the last morning and knowing that a quick wicket would open up a real chance of a Lancashire win, acceleration was out of the question until it was far too late. There was never a realistic chance of setting a target and the game died.

The two batting points surrendered by Middlesex radically changed the situation for the last round. Instead of being 12 points clear of Somerset and able to win the title with a high-scoring draw, the difference was 10: a draw would offer no guarantees if Somerset passed over the corpse of the relegated Nottinghamshire, on what seemed certain to be a sporting Taunton pitch.
Here, things muddy a little.

Somerset were to face the already relegated Nottinghamshire who had lost four of their previous five matches. With the game at Taunton and recent pitches there offering low-scoring minefields on which Jack Leach and debutant Dominic Bess had caused chaos (in the Warwickshire game, the innings had lasted 30, 49, 74 & 58 overs respectively, with Bess taking 6-28 in his debut innings), no one doubted that there would be a result, possibly in well under three days. Middlesex had to face Yorkshire on the low, slow Lord’s pitch which, all season, had produced a series of pretty turgid draws.
Photographs of the Taunton pitch at the Toss showed a surface that suggested that a two-day finish was as likely as the match stretching into a third day. This though was, if anything, good news to Yorkshire and Middlesex fans as it appeared unlikely that Somerset would take any batting points: with a 19-point win, Middlesex would need just 10 to win the title: score 250, take the bowling points, avoid defeat and the title would go to Lord’s.  For Yorkshire, matching the Somerset result would be enough.

Just possibly this feeling that a relaxing draw would be enough on a reliably low and slow Lord’s pitch, influenced what was to come. Even the fact that this was the same pitch that had produced an utterly one-sided One Day Cup Final did not dispel the feeling that there was no need to take the slightest risk when a draw would suit nicely.
The combination of a 1030 start, bowling conditions, tight bowling and a pitch that did not allow quick scoring at any stage plus, undoubtedly, some Middlesex butterflies, led to an arthritic crawl to 270ao. Add in overs lost to bad light (desperately slow over rates, leaving Middlesex at -8) and some rain (which duly arrived later in the match) and Middlesex were leaving themselves painfully vulnerable rather than seizing the moment. Do not do anything positive. Take the draw. Middlesex though were getting close to the point where the points deduction for a slow overrate might even lose them the title.

It was gripping. It was a titanic battle but, you could almost hear Geoff Boycott muttering “those dopy so and soes. There’s more brains in a pork pie.”
All the more so because, despite being able to field two Test bowlers in Imran Tahir and Samit Patel, Nottinghamshire let Somerset reach 300 and three batting points before finally waking up. Five wickets fell at 322, Somerset crashed from 302-2 to 322-9 but, in a final indignity to a Nottinghamshire side bereft of any self-confidence, the last pair were allowed to add 43, bring up the fourth batting point and ensure that Somerset were likely to take a 23-point win, totally changing the dynamic of the title race.

Only the fact that Somerset failed to enforce the follow-on stopped the match from finishing in two days. Even some heavy rain was never going to send the match into a fourth day.
With Somerset 13 points ahead and also ahead on the first tie-breaker (most wins, 6-5), a draw was no use to Middlesex and Yorkshire now needed a 23 point win as they were behind on the second tie-breaker (most defeats, 1-2), surely there would be some positive cricket at Lord’s?

Although both sides would probably deny it, there seemed to be a little bad feeling between the sides. Yorkshire were very aggrieved that Jonny Bairstow was not released and then Adil Rashid dropped out of the match (it turns out that off-field issues left him in no mental state to play). Middlesex, in contrast, had all their players available, with Tim Murtagh released for the game by Ireland. With Andrew Strauss calling the shots, one could understand that there was maybe a little paranoia going into the match. Then Nick Gubbins had edged behind on 97 and not walked. Had he been given, Middlesex might well have been dismissed for a little over 200. Other chances were dropped. A few marginal decisions went the Middlesex way. If you were Andrew Gale and walking a disciplinary tightrope it must have been really tough to take. It meant though that Yorkshire were in no mood to do anyone any favours at all.
Yorkshire’s chances of the title seemed over when Toby Roland-Jones had Lees, Ballance and Gale all for ducks. With Lyth out for 43 made from 53-4, you felt that Middlesex could win the natural way and settle the title race. Not a bit of it.

Same as in the previous game against Lancashire. Tim Bresnan, batting at #5, although with a career batting average near 30, added 116 with Hodd. Then 35 more with David Willey and when Nick Compton returned the favours received by dropping a sitter from Rafiq and the pair dug in, Middlesex must have felt that it was all over.
When Middlesex’s only chance of keeping the match alive was to allow Yorkshire to reach 350 quickly and keep them interested in the result, they continued to apply suffocating fields. Killing the game meant playing everything on an agreed declaration. Overs 98 to 107 took the best part of an hour out of the game and produced just 10 singles and 50 dot balls, as the Yorkshire last wicket partnership edged (literally, at times) to the promised land of 350. Surely Middlesex would have been better off had he had one of his bowlers offer a couple of juicy half volleys, or maybe a couple of balls that just happened to slip down leg (so sorry, ‘keeper!)

Murtagh, Roland-Jones and Finn produced an eye-watering 405 dot balls between them in the innings.
When you start your second innings 120 behind with just four sessions left, you rather expect a draw. When you then fall to 2-2 and are left to hobble to the Close at just a fraction over 2-an-over, you start the last day knowing that you will need the best part of an hour to reach parity, before even thinking of setting a target. On the final morning Yorkshire had a real chance to take a couple of quick wickets and set up a simple chase.

A quick calculation also showed that even if Middlesex scored at 4-an-over – well above anything achieved in the match so far – any declaration would not come until after Tea, with a target of around 220 from 25 overs. If you were a Somerset fan, only a clatter of early wickets seemed likely to disturb your road to a first ever title.
Lunch. 201-3. Middlesex lead 81.

Half an hour after Lunch. 210-3. Middlesex lead 90.
Middlesex would say that they were ensuring against defeat, but this was just ludicrous.

55 overs left. Lead 95 and the new ball about to arrive.
50 overs left. Lead 115. 20 from the last 5 overs is an improvement, but there is no danger of a result this way. And Middlesex are facing a hefty points deduction for a slow overrate that requires them to get back out and bowl some overs quickly.

239-3 from 85 overs. Middlesex have shown a little more urgency with 22 from the last 4 overs, but the match is still going nowhere fast. However, Andrew Gale either has a chronic stomach problem or even he has realised that what is happening makes no sense and is going off to negotiate with James Franklin, returning with an offer that is rejected and then trying again and again to get an agreement.
Lyth comes on to bowl: 4 4 4 6 . 4

Then Lees: 4 . . W (Jack Brookes, you idiot! What a stupid moment to take a blinding catch)  4 1
Lyth again: 4 4 4 4 4 .

Lees, a better over: 6 1 6 W (bowling a straight one though was a bad mistake) 4 6
74 from 4 overs has helped a lot, if not done much for the dignity of the game.

From here it is a matter of hitting the agreed two boundaries per over and defending the remaining balls. 46 from the next 5 overs and James Franklin signals the declaration by deliberately sending the ball straight up into the air for the bowler. How else does one declare? Maybe by putting on a silly hat and playing the Joker from It’s a Knockout?
240 from 40 overs looks a very generous target, but that run-rate has only been reached in the last 10 overs of pie-chucking so, in reality, it looks like an act of desperation for Yorkshire to accept it. For most of the game even well-set batsmen have struggled to reach 3-an-over. The only question seems to be whether or not Yorkshire will shut up shop if they are well short with 7 or 8-down.

It did not take long for the answer to come. Yorkshire were never close to the run-rate required. Tim Bresnan was the only batsman to score at the required run-a-ball. By the time that it came to 153 from 20 overs, the writing was on the wall: with 10 wickets in hand, fine; when it is only 7, you need everything to go right and cannot afford an accident. Once Bresnan (to a marginal LBW) and Gale fell in quick succession it was all over. Yorkshire knew that they could not win. Somehow it was appropriate that the end was brought with a Toby Roland-Jones hat-trick as Yorkshire decided to swing on and hand the title to Middlesex rather than shut up shop and give it to Somerset.
Seven thousand paid at the gate to watch. Probably a couple of thousand more watched as members. Who says nobody watches the County Championship?

Of course, this being Middlesex, there was a sting in the tail in the form of a 4 point deduction for slow over rate. How many points the Middlesex scorer has saved his team this season by negotiating away negative over rates no one knows: it is generally reckoned that if the over rate is -2, he can get it back to zero and thus save a two point deduction. A conservative estimate is that the scorer has saved his side some 20 points over the season: the difference between being Champions and finishing 3rd.
Hollow victory? Middlesex beat Yorkshire twice and beat Somerset at Taunton. They went through the season unbeaten and four of their eight wins were achieved away from home, while dead pitches at Lord’s made winning there almost impossible. Despite a slow start – their first win did not come until their seventh game and then to relegated Hampshire – with Middlesex starting that game only just above the bottom two, three wins from four matches in mid-season saw them rocket up the table from seventh to top and put down a marker. The chasing pack – Warwickshire, Lancashire and Durham – all faded, Middlesex did not. No other team could sustain a challenge. Somerset left themselves too much to do. Yorkshire, though affected by Test calls, never gave the impression of invincibility that they had in the previous two seasons. No, Middlesex were worthy winners. No other side could have claimed as much.

Friday, 16 September 2016

England v Bangladesh: A Batty Selection?


 

England v Bangladesh

A Batty Selection?

September 16th  2016

Rumour has it that the England selectors, never ones to duck controversy have picked Haseeb Hameed, Gareth Batty and Ben Duckett for Bangladesh.
The selection of Hameed is a good one: where better to blood only the second teenager to play for England since the controversial pick of Brian Close in 1949? He will come into the side in a series where the scrutiny will be less intense and the level of opposition somewhat friendlier than in Australia or South Africa.

Ben Duckett would be a more controversial pick. At face value, Ben Duckett and  Keaton Jennings look to have similar records: 3rd and top run-scorers in the country in First Class cricket in 2016.

 
Duckett
Jennings
Number of runs in 2016
1338
1576
Average
58.2
68.5
Centuries
4
7
50s
5
3
Top score
282*
221*
Team
Northamptonshire
Durham

Duckett was born in Kent, is a wicket-keeper and is in prolific recent form: 26, 6, 80, 185, 208, 12*, 5 & 70 in his last four Championship matches.
Jennings was born in Johannesburg, captained South Africa U19s in England in 2011 and then emigrated to the UK and served his qualification. His four games since the summer break have brought him 21, 0, 22, 171*, 40, 8, 201*, 11.

Both have made runs in struggling sides in which they have held together the batting. The difference is that where Duckett has made his runs in the relatively relaxed cricket of Division 2, Jennings has done it in Division 1 against far stronger attacks and with the handicap of playing half his games on the seamer-friendly pitch at Chester-le-Street.
It could well be that Duckett is going as cover for Jonny Bairstow on a tour where he may only get one day of cricket (the chances are that he will share the gloves in one of the two, two-day warm-up games and maybe get an innings), so the selectors feel that picking Jennings will be a waste of a batsman: or perhaps having another South African who has jumped ship in the squad is a jump too far. However, seven centuries in a First Class season does not broke much argument and one wonders what more Jennings has to do to get a chance.

Where selection is likely to be really controversial is in the spinners. Most pundits expect Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid to go and to be joined by one or two additional spinners. It is believed that Gareth Batty will be one and, possibly, Zafar Ansari or Liam Dawson.
While the Batty selection looked plausible two months ago, right now it will be seen as more evidence that playing for Surrey seems to imbue a player with mystical powers in the minds of the selectors.

Gareth Batty played the last of his 7 Tests in 2005 when Ashley Giles was injured and Batty replaced him for the pre-Ashes, Bangladesh series. 11 Test wickets at 66.6 will not strike fear into many Asian batsmen. In fact, after taking five wickets in his second Test match, in Sri Lanka, figures of 0-59, 1-47, 0-137, 2-185 and 1-44 convinced the selectors that he would never take enough wickets at this level.
Who are the top English-qualified spinners over the 2016 season?

 
Wickets
Average
Jack Leach
61
23.4
Ollie Rayner
50
22.0
Gareth Batty
41
32.3
Simon Kerrigan
34
36.4
Adil Rashid
32
33.8

To find Zafar Ansari and Liam Dawson we have to go down the list a fair way:

·        Ansari, 22 wickets at 31.4

·        Dawson, 15 wickets at 46.8

Zafar Ansari missed the early part of the season after the serious injury that wrecked his end to 2015 and stopped him from making his Test debut in the UAE. If he was good enough in September 2015, one can understand that he is good enough now and an opening batsman to boot, covering a second, vital squad position. Dawson though has been outshone by the 19-year-old Hampshire leggie, Mason Crane and his 31 wickets at 40.7. It is Crane, not Dawson, who has been the #1 Hampshire spinner, as reflected by bowling one hundred more overs in just about the same number of games.
Where the comparison starkest is in recent form. Who is really bowling well NOW?

Let us have a look at the recent games, after the Championship’s slightly illogical summer break

 
Games
Wickets-runs
Recent average
Ollie Rayner
4
24-414
17.3
Jack Leach
5
29-594
20.5
Liam Dawson
3
11-323
29.4
Zafar Ansari
3
7-219
31.3
Gareth Batty
5
6-342
57.0

Enough said? Dawson, Ansari and Batty together sum, in 11 games, the same number of wickets that Ollie Rayner has taken in his last 4 and a lot fewer than Jack Leach has taken in his last 5. If form means anything, go for the 25 year old Leach, or the 30 year old Rayner, not for a man who will be 39 when the 1st Test starts and who is right at the end of his career.

Tuesday, 13 September 2016

England v Bangladesh: The Fall and Rise and Fall of Alex Hales


 

England v Bangladesh

The Fall and Rise and Fall of Alex Hales

September 13th  2016

If there is one player who has epitomised the violent swings of fortune of the England team over the last year, it is Alex Hales.
An up and down year for England took another couple of unexpected tangents. First, after going 4-0 in the ODI series and setting a world-record score to boot, the series came to a shambolic end with a heavy defeat in the final ODI, followed by being utterly trounced in the only T20 as they staggered, drunkenly from 56-0 after 39 balls and threatening to cross 200, to 135-7. Pakistan won with more than five overs to spare and, as in the Test series, finished on a high and with the momentum. Those last two games of the international summer showed how England who, two games earlier, had looked sublimely untroubled in scoring 444-3 in 50 overs, can swing from brilliant to mediocre. There was some justification in the ODI, with a raft of changes introduced to rest some players and give a chance to others. Less good news was that with Adil Rashid and Moeen Ali being rested, Liam Dawson registered the worst-ever figures for an England debutant in an ODI. 8-0-72-2 was fairly eye-watering, although it is as well to record that just below Liam Dawson in the “worst-ever debut” list come Andrew Flintoff and Steve Finn, who both turned out okay.

While many regard Liam Dawson as the best young spinner in the country, it is interesting that, despite the lamentations to the contrary, the selectors have almost an embarrassment of choice of spinners for the two winter tours. Moeen Ali and Adil Rashid are assumed to be givens. Behind them, Ollie Rayner at Middlesex and Jack Leach at Somerset are causing mayhem from unexpected directions and both demand a call-up on the back of form, heavy wicket-taking and consistency. Ollie Rayner’s last three County Championship matches have produced 23 wickets (combined figures of 23-322). Middlesex fans have been frustrated for years knowing that he can attack and be lethal, but has all too often been used in a holding role to speed up the overrate and got overly defensive. If the selectors want to go for a form spinner, Ollie Rayner is currently the most destructive in the country.
If Ollie Rayner’s 23-322 since the summer break in the CC have put down a marker, what of Jack Leach’s 27 wickets in Somerset’s four matches since the break, including 2x6-for and 1x5-for? His wickets have been more expensive (27-529), but he has had to bowl long spells and put in hard grind in a much weaker attack than Ollie Rayner. With 56 First Class wickets, he is joint fifth in the wicket-taking list for 2016, somewhat ahead of Ollie Rayner, who is eleventh. Jack Leach was taking wickets in quantity even early in the season and has been consistent and threatening all summer.

Apart from Rayner and Leach, many fans have pointed to the golden summer that Gareth Batty is having with 41 wickets @ 32.3 and suggesting that he is the one outstanding candidate to head the attack in India. It is twelve years since he acted as unwilling stooge to Brian Lara’s 400* in Antigua: although picked twice more as cover for an injured Ashley Giles and briefly re-commissioned in ODIs in 2009, the 52-4-185-2 in that Antigua Test really finished him as an international bowler. However, fans will recall how Shaun Udal was plucked from pre-retirement obscurity in 2006 and won a Test in India and how both Pat Pockock and Peter Such were re-commissioned some years earlier with surprising success.
Many pundits will say that Liam Dawson (15 wickets @ 46.8) is the best young spinner in the country, while Simon Kerrigan has been disappointing this year (25 wickets @ 45.4), he has been a consistent performer over many years, while Zafar Ansari, who was picked as a spinner for last winter’s tours, is finally coming back to the sort of form that saw him selected, after injury saw him miss the start of the season (22 wickets @ 30.7, with 7-164 in his last two matches). Several other names are mentioned as promising spinners.

What though has really exercised the minds of pundits and fans is the latest extraordinary turn in the Alex Hales story. After a rather unhappy Test series in South Africa (to be fair, he was far from the only one to struggle with the bat), followed by a record-equalling ODI series against the same opponents, with his five consecutive 50s, crowned with a glorious century, he took a calculated risk and, when many fans thought that only heavy run-scoring in early season would save his place, decided to take off the first few games of the season. Obdurate performances to try to save games in a Nottinghamshire side that was unravelling fast, saved his Test place and a big fifty in each Test v Sri Lanka seemed to mark his breakthrough. The one thing that he failed to achieve was to get those last few runs to obtain a maiden Test century, but 5 half centuries is one more than Nick Compton (who reached 50 only 4 times in his 16 Tests), three more than Sam Robson (who reached 50 only twice in 7 Tests) and four more than Adam Lyth (who reached 50 just once in his 7 Tests): failure is relative here.
However, a poor series with the bat against Pakistan in the Tests led to many writing his obituary again, particularly after two failures in the first two ODIs, only to come back with the highest score by an Englishman in ODIs (and, unlike Robin Smith, whose record he broke, he is as English as you can get, born in Hillingdon in Middlesex). 743 runs @ 61.9 in 2016, with 4x50 and 3x100 is astonishing by any standards, more so even from a player who, only a few months before, was being written-off as a failure in ODIs.

However, with many questioning whether or not he had done enough to hang on to his Test place and the pundits saying, reluctantly, that he had probably done just enough, mainly due to the lack of obvious alternatives, Alex Hales has come up with a new surprise by withdrawing from the Bangladesh series on security grounds. It is only two Tests and, with the selectors having the habit of experimenting when England visit Bangladesh, it is quite possible that he would have been “rested” anyway. However, things have changed radically since the Pakistan Tests finished. Suddenly, it looks as if Alex Hales has ended his Test career.
There are several top-three batsmen who have made big runs this season. Tom Westley, with 1427 runs @ 62.0; Ben Duckett, with 1268 runs @ 57.6; Nick Browne, with 1196 runs @ 52.0; Nick Gubbins, with 1191 runs @ 59.6 and Chris Dent, with 1133 runs @ 45.3 have all shown some prolific form, not to mention a young sprog called Marcus Trescothick (1252 runs @ 52.2). While Westley is a #3 who could open, if necessary, the others are all genuine openers.

All but two of the above though have the not-inconsiderable issue of having made their runs against the much weaker, Division 2 attacks. Marcus Trescothick would no longer tour even if the selectors were to ask a 40-year-old to come back after ten years out of Tests. And Nick Gubbins, although he has his fans, has not been as eye-catching as some others, but will still be hoping that perhaps he gets the nod or, at very least, to be parked off-shore ready for a call-up on a Lions tour.
Two players have though really caught the eye.

A sequence of scores of 89, 57*, 114, 100*, 26, 17 & 56 by 19 year old Haseeb Hameed has led to a massive band-waggon calling for him to be picked for the Bangladesh tour. Having made his First Class debut at the end of the 2015 season, he has played just 18 matches, but his last eight have produced 4x100 and 5x50, boosting his average to 51.3. Bangladesh would be a great place to blood him before a far more politically charged tour to India where the pressures, on and off the field, will be far greater.
Another suitor for Alex Hale’s position is Keaton Jennings, another young player – this time 24 years old – whose record prior to this season was more likely to lead to calls for him to return to South Africa. However, he has committed his future to Durham, is now qualified for England and, despite Chester-le-Street’s  famously green pitches, is the run-away leading run-scorer in the country with 1565 runs @ 71.1 (almost 450 more than Haseeb Hameed, in three more innings) and has an impressive seven First Class centuries.

Quite possibly Alex Hales had not bet on a First Division opener who was already having a good season, scoring 201* on a famously tricky pitch, less than 48 hours after he had surrendered his opening position.
What will be interesting is to see if the selectors take both Keaton Jennings and Haseeb Hameed to accompany Alistair Cook in Bangladesh, with one of them, or maybe even both if the other is given a chance with the tricky #3 slot, having the chance to seal his place in the starting XI in India. The selectors have said that there will be no reprisals for either Hales or Eoin Morgan for missing the tour but, were Hales’s replacement to make a century in one of the two Tests, it would inconceivable that we would see Hales re-gaining his place in India.

While it is certain that Alex Hales will return to the ODI set-up in India, the chances great are that he will not even be in the Test party unless whoever replaces him has a dire tour. With England needing a stable opening partner for Alistair Cook and Nick Compton who might just have been pushed up the order instead, out of the picture, yet another player will have a chance to make a claim to be Andrew Strauss’s definitive replacement.
Rumour has it that a decision had already been made to go with Haseem Hameed this winter instead of Alex Hales. Maybe Hales just felt that he knew which way the wind was blowing and decided to bow-out gracefully, rather than be dropped. Whatever way it blows, the announcement of the touring parties is going to be met with great interest.