New Zealand
v England: 1st Test, Day 4
The Clock
Ticking for Cook and England, While a Bomb Explodes Under Australia
March 25th 2018
Despite the fact that only thirteen balls were possible on Day 3, the
match situation had not really changed: Day 4 was simply a matter of how long
New Zealand would bat before declaring and how many they would set England to
avoid an innings defeat.
When you have only scored 58 in your first innings, to bat again needing
369 to avoid an innings defeat or, what is the same, to survive 145 overs, is the toughest of assignments.
Assuming that they score at 3-an-over on the 5th Day, England will
not knock off the deficit until just 19 overs remain to play. That would mean
effectively leaving New Zealand no more than 4 or 5 overs maximum to chase, if they are to avoid defeat.
However, after the events across in Cape Town, to see a match in which
the only issue has been the battle between bat and ball, has been a refreshing
change. And when Trent Boult produced a brilliant last over, just as England’s
hopes were rising of mounting an astonishing 5th Day escape, no one
in the press conference afterwards asked him about what grade of sandpaper he
recommends using to rough-up the ball.
Many things can be said of England, but the total lack of any threat
posed by the England bowling in this Test shows that ball-tampering is not one
of them. The biggest disappointment of the Test is to see how England’s
much-vaunted seamers, who look so good in England, have been made to look so
second-rate by the New Zealand seamers, who have been so superior.
Unfortunately, even if England do somehow escape, their questions about
the side have scarcely been answered. Alistair Cook fell cheaply again. Scores
of 5 & 2 are not going to answer the doubts that he has the appetite to
continue to score big Test runs on a regular basis. Since the start of the winter
tour he has only reached 50 twice, one of them in the Townsville knockabout,
the other, his monumental 244* in Melbourne. In 11 of 17 innings he has reached
double figures, yet he has rarely made it count. Runs last summer and runs at
Melbourne have left him with plenty of credit in the bank, but the suspicion is
growing that his international career may not have much longer to run.
Similarly, his opening partner, Mark Stoneman has also left the big
question unanswered. This is his 9th Test. After being one of only
two batsmen to get into double figures in England’s sad first innings, he
scored a gritty 50 here – his fourth in Tests – only to give it away
immediately. Nothing can hide the fact that, despite 4x50 in Tests, his highest
score is only 56, his Test average, 27 and his First Class average is only 35.
One suspects that only a century in the 2nd Test will save his
career and that if either Nick Gubbins or Sam Robson starts the season well,
one or other of them will open with Alistair Cook against Pakistan at Lord’s on
May 24th. With several rounds of Championship matches before that 1st
Test, there will be opportunities for a batsman to put down a marker.
With Stoneman and Root batting comfortably, England seemed to be starting to wriggle free. This looked like the opportunity that Stoneman had been waiting for to make a century and to settle arguments about his place. He was confident enough to reach his 50 with a big six, before giving it away in the most Vince-like fashion. Come May, he may live to rue that shot.
With Stoneman and Root batting comfortably, England seemed to be starting to wriggle free. This looked like the opportunity that Stoneman had been waiting for to make a century and to settle arguments about his place. He was confident enough to reach his 50 with a big six, before giving it away in the most Vince-like fashion. Come May, he may live to rue that shot.
With James Vince apparently defenestrated, the second burning question
was about Joe Root at 3. Could he make a success of it? A double-failure for
Root in this Test, combined with a fit Ben Stokes, could just have seen James
Vince make a comeback in the 2nd Test. Root also reached his fifty
just before the Close and looked increasingly comfortable until Trent Boult
ratcheted-up his pace and hostility in his last two overs before the Close. It
did not take Mensa-like intelligence to work out that if England reached the
Close two-down with Root and Malan batting well, their chances of survival
start to grow considerably.
Root fell for a two-card trick and, possibly, his own need to show that
he would not retreat under any circumstances. When Boult hit his bottom hand a
wicked blow with the fourth ball of the last over of the day, Root decided to
bat on after treatment when a more pragmatic approach would have been to retire
hurt. Had he done that, the umpires would have signalled the Close. Root though
is tough enough to check out of hospital and come out to bat even when evidently
in no fit state to do so. Glove back on. Take guard again. Wicked bouncer.
Gloved to the ‘keeper. 94-1 and beginning to get out of the mire had become
132-3 and a renewed struggle to take the game even as far as Tea tomorrow.
Ben Stokes will have one ball of the over to survive from a fired-up
Boult in the morning before he and Malan have to set about blunting the attack.
Escape is unlikely. It will need yet another big innings from Malan,
supported by runs from Stokes, Bairstow, Moeen Ali and Woakes to pull it off.
But then, hope springs eternal and that is why hundreds of thousands of fans
will tune-in after midnight… just in case.
What to make though of events in South Africa?
When the series started it looked brutally one-sided. In the 1st
Test Australia were all over South Africa and looked set to win comfortably, as
they had done in previous series in South Africa. The change in the 2nd
Test though was as big as it was unexpected. What set off the change was a
series of controversial incidents, including on and off-field confrontations
between players and then between players and crowd. As the series heated-up,
the crowd became more and more hostile and suddenly the Australian team
discovered that getting it back is nothing like as enjoyable as handing it out
without fear of reprisal and have increasingly lost focus.
Over the years the Australian team has based much of its success on the
idea that visiting teams should be abused as much as possible on and off the
field. This has included the request from Darren Lehmann for the public to
target Stuart Broad and to make his life hell. While, of course, neither coach
nor players can control barracking and abuse from the crowd, nor such tactics
as setting off the fire alarm in the visiting team’s hotel during the night, or
waking players with early morning telephone calls requesting radio interviews,
nor have they done anything to condemn such behaviour. They regard it as part of
the hospitality service to be offered to visiting teams, while crude, on-field,
personal abuse is regarded as necessary to play the game in the right spirit.
When Darren Lehmann said that the abuse that his players were receiving
had “crossed the line” there was a certain irony to his comments given what
many players have received from Australian players and crowds without censure.
As one broadcaster and writer on the English game pointed out, “the line”
seemed to be positioned wherever was most convenient for Australian interests
at any given time.
What this series – and others – has shown is that when a side refuses to
be intimidated by Australian aggression and starts to give it back, the
Australians lose focus and can disintegrate themselves.
However, do we really want world cricket to turn into a contest to see
which set of players and its fans can be most yobbish? England can smirk, but
they themselves have been involved in some distasteful incidents in the past.
There are many alarming aspects of the latest incident. All sides push
the limits when they can. All sides resort, at least occasionally, to tactics
that are dubious or are gamesmanship. And all sides do like their home support to
give them a hand. And, of course, it is different when they are on the
receiving end rather than handing it out. Not all sides though sit down and
have an open, tour management discussion on how best to cheat when things are
not working on the field. And yes, it was cheating when other sides have done
it and it is cheating when Australia do it too.
There are still many aspects of what happened that are unclear. Surely
neither Cameron Bancroft nor the captain seriously believed that no camera
would pick up their attempts to rough-up the ball. How believable is the story that it was some dirty
sticky tape that had been used on the ball? Plenty of people watching the
images saw something that looked much more like sandpaper, which would surely
be far more effective anyway than some dirty sticky tape. Have the players
actually come clean even now? How much did Darren Lehmann know and have to do
with the plan?
As in the case of Watergate, the original crime was not such a bad one –
the umpires did not even change the ball, considering that its state had not
been altered – but the clumsy and incompetent cover-up made it infinitely
worse. Bancroft’s comic attempts to hide the evidence and willingness to lie to
the umpires when challenged, made things far worse than if he had come straight
out and confessed. The intention was
to damage the ball, even if the execution owed more to Monty Python than to
Professor James Moriaty. And, of course, video has come to light of Cameron
Bancroft apparently doing something underhand in the dressing room during the
Ashes series, meaning that he is now marked with previous.
As a Gloucestershire supporter, I am very glad that Mr Bancroft will not
be representing my county this summer and I know that other Gloucestershire
fans feel the same. The fall-out is only starting. Bancroft has signed with
Somerset, who have put out a statement to the effect that the decision on his
contract is under review. Certainly, if Bancroft were to come to Somerset, his
reputation would precede him and would be a major on and off-field distraction.
Bancroft’s position in the Australian side is far from secure (despite runs in
this Test, his average is hovering just over 30 after 8 Tests) – hence perhaps
his willingness to play along – and it would be easy to drop him on the pretext
of not scoring enough runs.
There are loud calls for Steve Smith to be stripped of the captaincy.
Probity as captain of your national team is important: Mike Atherton got away
with it, probably because he had a reputation as a decent person and captain
who had made a bad mistake, but Keith Fletcher, Mike Gatting and Andrew
Flintoff, quite rightly, did not and Ian Botham’s off-field antics ensured that
he was never given a second chance. However, there are rumours that Cricket Australia
are so horrified by the negative publicity generated by the whole affair and
the fact that it was so pre-meditated, that they are considering life bans for
Smith and Warner. As a legendary South African captain of the end of the 20th
Century found out: you cheat, you get caught, you face the consequences. Not
too many Boards are willing to overlook such matters in the face of public opinion.
In the English language the word “cheat”, or an accusation of cheating, has huge emotional consequences and the word has been used a lot to describe what happened. In the infamous Shakoor Rana incident with Mike Gatting, the trigger was the umpire observing Gatting move a fielder behind square, where the batsman could not see the change, stopping play (no “dead ball” call though) and, telling Gatting that he was a cheat (the English version) or, in the umpire’s version, “you are making unfair play”. The word “cheat” inflaming passions to the point that Gatting snapped.
If Smith and Warner do go, it will be a massive blow to the Australian
side, but would be a huge PR coup, showing that after all, Australians do want
to win by fair means and not foul. It also remains to be seen if Darren Lehmann
can ride out this storm: his position would become very difficult.
The remainder of the South African tour is going to be very difficult,
if not impossible, anyway. How do you recover from an issue of this kind? And let us not forget that Australia tour England this summer for an ODI series
and that Smith and Warner (and conceivably, Bancroft) would form part of that
touring squad.In the English language the word “cheat”, or an accusation of cheating, has huge emotional consequences and the word has been used a lot to describe what happened. In the infamous Shakoor Rana incident with Mike Gatting, the trigger was the umpire observing Gatting move a fielder behind square, where the batsman could not see the change, stopping play (no “dead ball” call though) and, telling Gatting that he was a cheat (the English version) or, in the umpire’s version, “you are making unfair play”. The word “cheat” inflaming passions to the point that Gatting snapped.
No comments:
Post a Comment