Ashes 2013
Same old story
December 13th 2013
When
Alistair Cook lost the toss for the fourth consecutive time you knew what was coming.
In seven Ashes Tests this year, the side that won the toss has gone on to
dominate and, all but twice (in rain affected games), to win. After the first
day it would be a brave man who would vote against eight out of eight.
We are
seeing the exact reverse of the summer. Last summer England would lose early
wickets, fight back and Australia would be unable to finish off the job because
of lack of depth in the bowling. Now it is that Australia win the toss and bat,
losing early wickets before a middle order recovery knocks the stuffing out of
England because England lack the depth to finish the job with the ball.
As suggested
yesterday, England went for the least bad of the options making a straight swap
of Bresnan for Monty. Before the tour a lot of fans were worried about the
selectors painting themselves into a corner by selecting three tall, fast
bowlers, giving themselves few real options. While there were good reasons for
worrying about Chris Tremlett, who looked a shadow of his former self last
summer, Finn and, above all, Rankin, looked like safe bets to enjoy the extra
bounce. The reality though has been that since his 5 wicket burst early in the
tour, Finn has gone backwards and Rankin has never threatened to challenge for
a place.
Jon Agnew
came up with the lovely phrase that, rather than fighting fire with fire,
picking Finn would have been like fighting fire with petrol. So, instead,
England supported Broad and Anderson with the returning Bresnan, who was always
likely to be feeling his way back and the apprentice, Stokes, who is not a
wicket-taking bowler (yet) at this level.
I felt that
England needed to knock over Australia for 220 to stay in the match. At 143-5,
it looked on. Australia could even have rolled over for under 200. At 326-6 at
the Close, with Smith past his century and Mitch Johnson closing in on another
50, the cause looks lost and, with it, the Ashes. It is frustrating, because
England are a lot better than this and the gap between the teams is nowhere near as large as it has appeared to be.
No comments:
Post a Comment