England v
Bangladesh: 1st Test, Day 3
The Sting in
England’s Tail Augers Well for India
October 22nd 2016
Now the bad news: it only came after another
horrific top-order collapse that left the match in the balance again.
At first sight, normal service. England established
a useful lead of 45 in a low-scoring Test. However, with Bangladesh 221-4 just
before the Close last night, only 72 behind and looking comfortable, it could
so easily have been 100 behind. When Ben Stokes took Mushfiqur Rahim’s wicket just
before the Close last night, it was getting close to desperation time. Even so,
Bangladesh must have been expecting to earn a lead of some kind. Little could
anyone imagine that Moeen Ali would start the morning with a bang taking the
sort of wicket that only Moeen seems to take: Shakib Al Hasan, who many would
argue is the best player that Bangladesh have ever produced, gave him the
charge, second ball of the morning and wonder of wonders, Jonny Bairstow made
the stumping.
The opprobrium of Shakib has been almost universal –
it set the tone for a horrendous Bangladesh capitulation – but it is just an
extension of the tactics that we have seen so often, particularly from Asian
batsmen: go after Moeen and try to destroy his confidence. Had the stroke been
better executed, it would have been a six second ball of the day and the
momentum would have been right back with Bangladesh. Like Adil Rashid, Moeen
can be expensive and give you a bumper bag of liquorice allsorts, but he also
makes things happen and takes too many wickets for it to be pure chance.
Batsmen look at him and think that it is their lucky day if this is the best
that England can offer, but keep falling to him.
Moeen’s last 5 Tests have produced 398 runs at 56.9
and 14 wickets, albeit at the slightly inflated cost of 41.9. And were it not
for the fact that Ben Stokes has set himself up for it, he would have a real
shout at the Man-of-the-Match award (and may yet win it). England are fortunate
to have Moeen and Ben Stokes (250 runs at 35.7 and 17 wickets at 18.2 in his
last 5 Tests) to provide stability and, on occasion, a substantial sting in the
tail for England when 4 or 5 wickets have fallen cheaply, as they have in both
innings here.
With Adil Rashid giving support with the wicket of
Shafiul Islam, just as it looked as if Bangladesh had weathered the early
storm, the new ball in the hands of Ben Stokes proved to be a catch-weight
contest against the tail. It left Stokes with the extraordinary figures of
14-5-26-4 and England’s seamers bowling a combined 29 overs for just 53 runs.
What we are seeing is a pattern: the ball spins a
lot when hard and batting is really tough for the first 30 overs with the new
ball; then, as it softens, batting becomes substantially easier. England were
21-3 in the 1st innings and 28-3 in the 2nd. England’s
top 4 have registered just one score of more than 15 in 8 attempts in the match,
which is not good enough. Much of the scrutiny will fall on Gary Ballance (1
& 9) and many will wonder if England might not have done better to give his
place to Zafar Ansari, whose chances of a debut in the 2nd Test must
be improving by the day. A graphic published by the BBC, showing the constant and alarming downward
trend in Ballance’s runs per Test over his career has done him no favours and
shown – quite literally, graphically – his continuing decline in form. Similarly,
there will be those who wonder if, given what has happened, Hameed’s grit at
the top of the order might have been preferable to Duckett’s bluster. However,
now that England have gone down the Duckett route they will most certainly give
him a few Tests. They will be hoping that Duckett helps to give England the
explosive starts that they been missing since Marcus Trescothick retired from
Tests.
The best news for England is that they are showing
that they can deal with a sharply spinning ball, with noisy fielders crowding
the bat putting excessive pressure on the umpires, with the knack of getting
their DRS challenges right and, even if they are 4 or 5 down for not very much,
can come back and make a competitive total. One or two of the tremendously
dismissive Indian fans may just be wondering about their predictions of a
totally uncompetitive massacre and a 5-0 scoreline. Similarly, the seamers are
managing to get some reverse swing, whereas the Bangladesh attack, more used to
the conditions, is achieving very little. We even had the slightly bizarre
spectacle of Bangladesh bringing back a seamer, seemingly to rest its spinners!
Speaking of DRS, this has been an extraordinary
match: 19 reviews in the match (one more will make this the Test with the
highest number of reviews ever), 9 decisions overturned (a record), 6 of them
from Umpire Dharmasena, who will be dreaming of players in white making
T-shapes for some time after this Test.
England need Woakes and Broad to hang around for a
while in the morning. Alternatively, if Stuart Broad can remember the persona
who, in the past, changed innings by slogging a quick 30 or 40, that will also
do nicely. If they reach 248, they will condemn Bangladesh to make the highest
score of the match to win. 254 would push the victory target up to 300. And 272
all out would set Bangladesh the challenge of making the highest ever successful
chase at this ground to win.
In summary: the key numbers for England:
217 - Bangladesh's highest ever successful 4th innings chase (215 was the target).
248 - England will set Bangladesh the highest total of the match to win.
254 - Bangladesh will need 300 to win.
272 - Bangladesh will need to beat the highest ever successful chase at this ground to win.
Only 28 times in Test cricket has a side chased 300 or more successfully to win.
In summary: the key numbers for England:
217 - Bangladesh's highest ever successful 4th innings chase (215 was the target).
248 - England will set Bangladesh the highest total of the match to win.
254 - Bangladesh will need 300 to win.
272 - Bangladesh will need to beat the highest ever successful chase at this ground to win.
Only 28 times in Test cricket has a side chased 300 or more successfully to win.
No comments:
Post a Comment