Sunday 3 April 2016

The World T20: A Stunning West Indian Double


 

The World T20

A Stunning West Indian Double

 

April 3rd  2016

 

The governance of Caribbean cricket may be dysfunctional. The game may be dying as the Test team shambles from defeat to defeat. The island teams are no longer as strong as many Test sides. Youngsters are more likely to want to play basketball in the USA than they are to want to play cricket. But the West Indies still produce naturally talented players. And today, to prove it, the West Indies are both mens’ and womens’ T20 World Champions.

While the victory of the men was not a huge surprise – they were narrow favourites after all – no one expected a double. After England won the inaugural tournament in 2009, Australia have won the next three. The Australian boast is that players like Ellyse Perry are so good that they would not be out of place in the mens’ team. The Australian womens’ game is fully professional. What hope did a bunch of amateurs have against that kind of fire power?

And more after a nervous start saw the Australians race away and set a target bigger than any conceded in the tournament save by the overpowered Irish and Bangladeshis. Even that was a reasonable comeback. Most people thought that Australia would win with ease, but logic does not always rule in T20. A stunning opening partnership of 120 between Hayley Matthews and Stefanie Taylor set up the chase and Deandra Dottin made sure that the West Indies got over the line. Whereas Ellyse Perry has had a quite anonymous tournament, Dottin has been immense: 129 runs and 9 wickets @ 13.6. Stefanie Taylor though, has been phenomenal: 246 runs and 8 wickets @ 15.3.

The high scores in the womens’ Final made a high-scoring mens’ Final seem likely. Again, things did not work out as expected. When the West Indies won the Toss and decided to chase for the sixth time you sensed that the title was already in the bag barring a major brain-fade. When England had lost both openers in 11 balls and the hapless Morgan soon after – with 145 runs in ten appearances for England in official and unofficial T20s this year, he is struggling for runs – it looked as if the match could be embarrassingly one-sided. 23-3 after 5 overs is no way to set a winning total. Incredibly though, from the end of over 3 to the end of over 19, England were always ahead on runs scored: after 13 overs, as many as 27 ahead.

Bizarrely, after David Willey took the new ball, Joe Root took the second over and wickets with his first and third balls: the West Indian openers lasted even less time than their English counterparts had. Fifteen balls, the West Indies 11-3. Game on. Thanks very much. Root did not bowl again. And Moeen Ali did not bowl at all.

In the end, the key moment was perhaps the first ball of the seventh over. Plunkett bowls a slower ball. Samuels nicks. Buttler takes a low catch and, for about thirty seconds, the West Indies are 37-4. Fortunately for Samuels, he had not crossed the boundary rope because replays showed that Buttler had dropped the catch, only to take it on the rebound. Samuels was reprieved, the wickets wound back and Samuels anchored the West Indies with 85*. It should not have been enough. Willey and Jordan kept things tight in overs 17-19. It comes to something when you take 11 off an over at the death but it is a tragedy because it is nowhere near enough. Two miserly overs from Jordan left Ben Stokes with nineteen to defend. What followed was a horribly painful disintegration. Leg tump half volley hammered for six by Carlos Brathwaite. Slightly short… six again. And six again. Three dots for the super over, but Brathwaite settled things with a fourth consecutive six. Brathwaite ended up with 34 from 10 balls and the party began.

Few people can begrudge the West Indians their triumph. Almost no one fancied them as winners and no one expected them to topple India in the Semi-Final.

For England it is a tournament of positives: deserving finalists. Roy, Jordan, Stokes, Buttler, Willey have all developed as players. Joe Root has been magnificent. Matches have been won from seemingly impossible positions. The team is developing a steel that bodes well for future challenges. The next World T20 will not be until 2020 (how apt!) Now a summer is coming up in which England have two winnable Test series; there must be no final Test slip-ups – both series must be won clinically. The slap and giggle has finished, now minds must turn to the County season already started and to the summer Tests.


[On reflection (next morning): Only time will tell if this is another of those frequent false dawns of West Indian cricket. What is certain is that these two victories will help to keep the flame of cricket alive in the West Indies: given that that flame is flickering and threatening to die, that is no small matter. What is wonderful is that despite everything, despite the very real threat to withdraw by the players in their long-running dispute, they came out to enjoy themselves, to play calypso cricket and to win. They were not distracted by pay, by governance, by lack of respect from their administrators. The West Indies were deserving winners for calmness under pressure when the match looked to have slipped away. They also beat England twice, just to show that it was not an accident. No one gave the West Indies much of a chance before the tournament – never write them off.

For England it was a remarkable “what might have been”. Remember how, in the CricInfo poll before the World T20, just 0.8% of respondents saw England winning the title? Nearly twice as many picked Afghanistan. Three times as many picked Bangladesh. England reached the Final, eliminating South Africa, Sri Lanka and New Zealand on the way and rescued some awful positions in doing so, showing just how tough this new team is becoming and how hard it is to beat them. In a match in which England probably needed to score 190 to off-set the loss of the Toss and bowling second, it took something quite extraordinary in the final over to get the West Indies over the line. Once again, as they had against South Africa, against Afghanistan and against Sri Lanka, England fought back from a seemingly hopeless position – far from an early finish the game was very much alive in the final over. Ben Stokes is devastated. He is treading ground that others have tread previously: Stuart Broad is still remembered for those 6x6 in the inaugural World T20, but he came back to be a pretty useful bowler. Stokes has developed tremendously. Early in the tournament the prospect of him as a death bowler caused terror, but he has done it bravely and well. There is always the danger that a bowler will take some hammer in the death overs and freak feats of hitting are a fact of life, which is what has made Chris Jordan’s performances so remarkable. Regularly taking overs 17 and 19 he has gone for 7 and 8 v West Indies, 3 and 9 v New Zealand, 6 and 7 v Sri Lanka, 5 and 11 v Afghanistan (where he took overs 16 and 19). In an era in which 50-60 runs from the last 4 overs is regarded as pretty standard, those eight death overs have gone for just 55.

Yes, both sides can rightly feel proud of their efforts and achievements.]

The World T20: A West Indian Double? Probably Not…


 

The World T20

A West Indian Double? Probably Not…

 

April 2nd  2016

 


Given that at one point it was not even certain who would turn up in the name of the West Indies given the long-running and acrimonious dispute between the players and the dysfunctional Board. With the precipitous decline of cricket in the Caribbean, it is nothing short of miraculous that the West Indies have reached both finals. Not just that, but they have done it in magnificent fashion.

The womens’ game is dominated by the Big Three – Australia, New Zealand and England – yet the West Indies have gatecrashed the party big time: they almost toppled England in the group stage and beat the unbeaten New Zealand in the Semi-Final. Their side looks good enough to give the almost unbeatable Australians – Champions in four of the last five editions of the tournament – a real run for their money. You have to believe that the Southern Stars will be too good for the ladies of the Caribbean, but you know that 90% of the neutrals will be willing the West Indies over the line, in what would be the greatest shock in world cricket since Sri Lanka exploded onto the scene by winning the World Cup in 1996.

In contrast, the mens’ team probably start favourites. Test cricket may not inflame passions and encourage mass participation any longer in the Caribbean, but T20 does. It embodies the spirit of Calypso cricket that the West Indies made their own, with outrageous batting feats, over three decades. The West Indians do not frighten anyone any longer when they wear white, but put them in maroon pyjamas and they rule the night. Players who are mediocre from 11am to 6pm, suddenly become supermen under floodlights: batsmen show amazing powers, bowlers become untouchable.

There is no question that the three outstanding teams of the tournament have been New Zealand, West Indies and England. However, New Zealand were de-railed when their attempt to use Plan A for a fifth consecutive match failed because it came up against a side that was much more comfortable with this plan than with anything else and there was no Plan B in the locker. While England had managed to win, somehow, with a Plan B (most notably against Sri Lanka), the game against South Africa showed that their preferred plan was to ask a side to set a target and say “you set any score that you want and we will chase it down”. England’s chase was so comfortable that you have to think that New Zealand would have struggled to defend even 200 or 210.

However, the West Indies come into the Final in a similar situation to New Zealand in the Semi-Final: the have chased in every single match so far. Success has been based on restricting the opposition and then chasing: in three of their five matches the opposition has set 122 (Sri Lanka and South Africa) or 123 (Afghanistan). England’s 182-6 was chased down with some comfort and India’s 192-2, slightly less so, although the result was not in doubt in the last couple of overs. Will the West Indies be able to adapt if it is the opposition who are chasing? Is there a West Indian Plan B?

The World T20 has been won on four out of five occasions by the team winning the Toss. On this occasion, with both sides preferring to chase and with the likelihood that dew will make bowling at the death difficult, it is hard to avoid believing that whoever wins the Toss will win the match. With the sides well-matched, the advantage of winning the Toss could covert what should be an exciting and even contest into a one-sided disappointment.

If you are an England fan you look at the amazing parallels with 2010 and wonder if history will repeat itself, with a faltering start and defeat to West Indies in the first match to a run of five straight victories and England’s only world title. To complete the fairy-tale, Eoin Morgan’s key contribution will have to be the one half an hour before a ball is bowled. If England have to defend a target, the only possible chance will be to set 200+ and pray.

Friday 1 April 2016

The World T20: India Prove Generous Hosts


 

The World T20

India Prove Generous Hosts

 

March 31st  2016

 

Both sides provided a surfeit of generosity, but it was India’s that, in the end, killed their chances of making the Final. Had the West Indies not, incredibly, missed running out Virat Kohli three times in two balls, the Indians would probably not have managed such a substantial total that they should have been able to defend – although any affirmation of what might have happened in T20 tends to be dangerous. However, given that he is the only Indian batsman to pass 90 runs in the tournament and has scored 41% of all the runs off the bat by India in their five matches, his loss on 1 could well have proved decisive.

It must be one of the strangest incidents ever in a cricket match. Kohli was beaten by a Bravo delivery and tried to run a bye to the ‘keeper.

Chance 1: Ramdin only needed to walk up to the stumps and break them with Kohli stranded half way up the pitch. He decided to roll the ball onto the stumps and missed.

Chance 2: Bravo picked the ball up in the middle of the pitch, with Kohli still well out of his ground. He threw and missed them on the other side. Kohli then scrambled back. Two simple runout chances missed off a single delivery.

Chance 3: Next ball, clipped to Deep Square Leg. Kohli decides to run two. The throw comes in to Ramdin, who fails to collect cleanly with Kohli well out again. A despairing dive and, by the time Ramdin has cleaned up the fumble, Kohli is safe.

Given these let-offs, India will be disappointed to have not got past 200. Despite running a lot of ones and twos, there were surprisingly few boundary hits and even fewer maximums: 17x4, 4x6.

The West Indies had a dreadful start: 19-2 after 3 overs, with both Gayle and Samuels out. That should have been the end of the match. When the asking rate got to 73 from 36 balls it only needed clear heads to see India home. However, to show their generosity as hosts, if Kohli was reprieved three times, Lendl Simmonds had to be too: twice with front-foot no balls and once when the fielder touched the rope taking a catch. You can blame the dew for bowling loosely at the death: all sides have struggled with it, but giving a key batsman two let-offs with front foot no balls is unforgiveable.

The West Indies decided that running twos was a bit too much like hard work and went for Route 1 instead: 20x4 and 11x6 – 146 in boundaries. When you do that, you can allow the occasional dot ball. Even though India only allowed 26 dot balls to pass and bowled an impressive 47 dots themselves, they forgot the basic premise that bowling three dots in an over is pretty meaningless if the other three balls all pass the boundary rope at great speed.

That is a pretty amazing number: the West Indies failed to score off almost 40% of deliveries, but still sustained 10-an-over.

India fail to break the hoodoo on hosts winning the title. The reasons are fairly clear. Although only Tamim Iqbal of Bangladesh, who played one match more and who faced several Associate attacks, aggregated more runs than Virat Kohli, we have to go all the way down to 36th place to find the next highest Indian run-scorer (in contrast, England have Root, Roy and Buttler in the top six and the West Indies, three in the top sixteen), while the top Indian bowler is joint 18th in the wicket table.

So now, we are left with a West Indies v England Final: not quite what the locals expected, or hoped, to see.

England were poor in their first match of the tournament: their defeat to the West Indies. Since then, England have just made one change to the side: Reece Topley has been replaced by Liam Plunkett and, suddenly, the balance of the attack has changed – there is no longer the sameness of pace, the lack of new ball threat (although Plunkett has not taken the new ball). There are plenty of bowling options based on pace, seam, swing (if on offer) and spin in both directions. But, as in the Semi-Final, they face an attack that has an attack that has performed outstandingly well: two of the five best economy rates for bowlers who have bowled at least 8 overs in the tournament belong to Badree and Benn.

The Final will be hard to call. Most neutrals will be rooting for the West Indies, but it will be interesting to see how they deal with an England team that is on the up. Whatever happened in the early stages of the competition will have little bearing on the result and remember, when England won in 2010, they were well-beaten by the West Indies in their opening game and barely scrambled out of their group.